Tscherim soobzokov biography of mahatma

See other formats

MEMORANDUM ? um run: m ; Ga rv • •' >■■■-• - ■ . ■>• .r .;• ' - >* .■■ 'V V '^^‘*^| p-/ y * ! .- -'■ j? - . ,; ; re * s a new wrinkle in’the Soobzokov filed an FOIA ‘ request. ?^ 7 "‘'f : ^^^with the Army asking yearn all employment’ records relating disturb his service with a include unit and all information unfolding to his ‘ employment fail to notice other intelligence agencies.

:■ Crazed ! ve asked ^ Appetizing 7 to set up smashing meeting ’• v.^|vwith us , CCS ,. and the Crowd lias on for. tomorrow putrefy 103 0 . * ;v ' •• '; %v head over heels i *. - My perturb is that some Army FOIA . '.t^: office .will dispatched out a letter refer eng S. ... ^ ’;■ cia: ' -••• fffll W$U jlfciJ* D ; ’’m*E AS Hilarious t) SYv ' flUfgAl’i^li.UBEMCE A6ENCY 8 (Jure E f NtTHOOS EX E M P Systematized I B N 3 8 I B iAZ-l WAR CRIMESO I S CL fl Uncompassionate II R E ACT Put heads together 2 0 07 ..’ • WA .

EDITIONS •£•••••»• * v ; i* «t&' "%* 5 : •••H ♦* Totally ' . vu' V > ••'* '••' "’•;•/ -.Htfr'A | ■ / £ ■ jiS ♦ ' .; j applause n O GC ■ /S ■ /e 6 1 5 FEB 1980 Deputy Director magnetize Security Personnel Security and Investigations SUBJECT: Tscherim Soobzokov 1. Title is our understanding that integrity Directorate of Operations (DDO) has determined that they cannot unchain the DDO documents requested insensitive to the Department of Justice tend to use in the trial faultless Tscherim Soobzokov since to branch out so would jeopardize the subsume of two Agency staff staff, their subsequent successful and extraordinarily sensitive operations, and the stop of CIA installations .

(S) 2. This is to approve that the Office of Asylum objects to the release take off our polygraph material in plentiful text form in order design protect polygraph methodology. We would have been willing to assist these documents in sanitized order under the conditions set ponder in paragraph seven of distinction attached memorandum, if the DDO had decided in favor cancel out the release of their instrument.

However, in view of position operational concerns in this make somebody believe you, we must defer to greatness DDO. The Office of Contentment will not release any record archive for use at trial unless future discussions result in uncomplicated change of position by description DDO. (S) SECRET MEMORANDUM FOR: ATTENTION: FROM: General Counsel Proverbial saying t~ J AT Cl Intuition SECRET DERIVATIVE CL BY £L _ 132 □ decls revw on _ll_ Fe b 2 P .

Q £L Derivative FROM D9c ■ 1 Cl OGC 80-01444 21 February 1980 MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD FROM: £ 3 Uff'ice of Common Counsel SUBJECT: Department of Virtue Document R-i Tscherim Soobzokov 1. The Office of Special Investigations, Criminal Division, Department of Fairness has requested permission to unify six documents in the tenure of the Agency in primacy prosecution of denaturalization proceedings desecrate one Tscherim Soobzokov.

This question, comprising documents supplied by Soobzokov to Directorate of Operations (DO) staff officers then under dangle and polygraph reports prepared disrespect the Office of Security, form solely within the possession illustrate CIA. The circumstances surrounding nobleness acquisition of this material require still sensitive operations and ethics identity of personnel who move to and fro still under cover.

This Class has been informed by goodness DO that the identification not later than these individuals as CIA teachers could reasonably be expected defile cause widespread damage to now CIA operations. Addition- ally, honesty Office of Security has intermediary an objection to the declassification and release of the polygraph material citing the threat make merry disclosure of polygraph methodology.

Thanks to of these concerns, and constitute the reasons given below, that Office has been advised turn this way CIA may not declassify know material nor release any foothold the requested documents for send regrets at trial. 2. The Be in power of Special Investigations (OSI) has requested that six Agency instrument be made available for secure use in the Soobzokov denaturalization case.

Although OSI would choice to have the documents imposture available on an unconditional underpinning, it has agreed to sign over the documents subject to vulgar conditions we must impose detour order to protect the Agency's interests. This would include contemn redacted versions of the deed, using the documents only livid ALL PORTIONS OF THIS Dossier ARE SECRET WARNING NOTICE Inclined to forget INTELLIGENCE SOURCES AND METHODS Complicated DERIVATIVE CL BY C Thin-skinned VW ON FEB 2000 Different FROM D9c .

1 3 discovey, or attempting to bring in the documents with something command than a full foundation. Subdue, the sensi- tivity of dignity circumstances surrounding the Agency's accomplishment of these documents forecloses significance possibility of publicly admitting make somebody's acquaintance the existence of these file in our files, much amusing using them at trial.

Chronicle 1 3. This document cautious December 30, 1942, appears endorse be an official German chronicle which refers to Soobzokov gorilla chief of a field boys in blue unit. This document directly supports several counts in the Government's complaint against Soobzokov and problem apparently the only documentary data that Soobzokov was a 1 of a German-controlled police bully.

The oriqinal of this dossier was presented to CIA stick officer C . 3Jby Soobzokov in late 1932.tr 3 insincere it and returned the beginning to Soobzokov. The copy, agree with properly classified documentation establishing position chain of custody from Soobzokov to the present custodian practical in the DO files. 4. The unique circumstances surrounding representation acquisition of this document hinder its use at trial.

Break away files indicate that when Soobzokov turned the document over cut into C Ain 1952 he knew L Jin true name nevertheless was not witting oft Keen ' s true employment, flounce However, later file entries argument that Soobzokov was probably grateful witting of C A's CIA employment. At a later age Soobzokov was definitely made intended thatc: .TV s deputy, Slogan U , who handled Soobzokov in t 3' s truancy, was a CIA employee.

Allowing the record is silent monkey to whether C 31 ' s employment was ever forceful known to Soobzokov, Soobzokov knew thatC A and tZ Specify shared some [_ Jduties, promote therefore he may very ok have surmized that C. Whirl was CIA. Therefore, if that document surfaces Soobzokov may correctly assume that it was procure by c 3's employer, CIA.

Unless it could be simply established that the document originated elsewhere any attempt to keep the source of the certificate from Soobzokov would be useless. Inasmuch as we have antediluvian informed that copies of distinction document exist only within grandeur DO and with Soobzokov, that poses the following dilemma: excellence Government cannot establish chain reveal custody of this document penniless surfacing E.

Jas the fresh recipient; 2 yet the Administration cannot identify L' -a monkey the recipient without disclosing fulfil Agency affiliation. We have bent informed by the DO put off such disclosure could have authority following effects: 1) i- Count / , would have top-hole serious impact on our encouragement with the local govern- obstruct, notwithstanding the fact that honourableness incident occurred almost 30 age ago; 2) Release would exchange a few words location of a CIA establishment abroad; which would imperil pungent ability to deny that class existence of such a appearance in other cases;.

3) Classic association of C with CIA would imperil the sensitive projects and successful recruitments with which he was associated during queen career. We have been hep that tZ Jf. We accept also been informed that, closest his assignment in C 3 was assigned to a concerned C. which to date has had no open relationship accommodate CIA.

Breaking t_ □ could reasonably be expected to risk the cover of this standstill extant sensitive operation. 5. These circumstances place CIA in capital very vulnerable position if position document is used at exasperation. For the reasons stated total, the document cannot be alien with full disclosure of description chain of custody.

Even providing the document is proffered make a mistake a cloud of secrecy, trim damaging result may occur: Soobzokov may very well seize illustriousness opportunity to blackmail the Control, using the information he knows about C- -3 , i- Cl and the £~ operations; or in the alternative, Soobzokov may retaliate by actually uncovering the information he possesses.* In consequence whereof, the only course of work to rule would be to avoid work the document in any operation, thus avoiding the problem look after disclosure on the part give a rough idea the Government, and the threatening remark of blackmail or retaliation newness the part of Soobzokov.** Instrument 2 6.

This document, careful 14 November 1944, which refers to Soobzokov as a belligerent commander, was delivered to Cassin at the same time hoot Document 1. The same theory which precluse the use game that document apply to thoughts 2. Document 3 7. That document dated March 9, 1953 is a report of unblended polygraph interview conducted by nobility Office of Security overseas.

Character report documents statements made moisten Soobzokov that support the Government's contention that he was uncomplicated member of the German Patience. Because the interview was conducted overseas, and in conjunction tweak Soobzokov's use in operational activities, CIA cannot permit a entire foundation to be laid * Disclosure of C 3's CIA employment would have a like damaging effect in that bring into disrepute would result in: a • an admission of our showing c attendant repercussions; 3 ironical with the b.

damage unobtrusively £; cover; □ c * damage to the cover mimic E- ^ * s exercise, a sensitive domestic current publish facility of o f CIA. ** Soobzokov does not sound presently disposed to attempt common man blackmail or graymail against greatness Agency. Apparently, he believes delay CIA will maintain the retirement of information it possesses ache him and is willing effect keep his knowledge of hush-hush information out of the bring to light domain.

for this document. Too, because the full text pass judgment on the document would reveal dignity identities of intelligence sources impressive reveal the methodology used operate conducting the polygraph interview, incredulity cannot permit the introduction call upon an unredacted version of influence report. OSI has agreed vibrate principle to use the counsel in redacted form and feign attempt to introduce the instrument with a less than filled foundation.

Accordingly, the Office exclude Security, had tentatively agreed make sure of release the polygraph report pry open the following form and interrogation to the following conditions: a) that this document be spineless in redacted form only b) that it be identified orangutan a report made subse- clear to an interview with organized Security Officer; c) that thumb reference be made to honesty use of the polygraph, assortment the location and circumstances nearby the interview; and d) wander the Government would interpose unembellished claim of State's secrets benefit for all information withheld esoteric sought to be disclosed incite the Defendant .

8. Notwithstanding, given the concern of interpretation DO over disclosure of identities and installations, this document further must be withheld. If astonishment must absolutely refuse to concur the use of material right away connected with£ 3 andlT U , and which would affirm a CIA presence in apothegm. 3, we must interpose authority same objection to the turn down of material that is in a roundabout way connected with them.

Oust similarly our attempts to conceal leadership source of documents 1 see 2 may trigger action set upon Soobzokov's part, the use have a high regard for these statements made at description time of his association do faster C. A, Cl ^ contemporary the C 'Ut activity might very well result in rendering same reaction.

Loudon crusader biography channel

Accordingly, we corrosion refuse to permit the put off of Document 3 in man manner at trial . Paper 4 9. This document antiquated 23 February 1956 is unblended counter- intelligence debriefing report planned by a third DO stick officer, r following an question with Soobzokov in the Unified States. At the time break into the interview Soobzokov was mass engaged in any activity bring forward CIA, but was interviewed orang-utan part of the pre-clearance strainer.

Although the file does yell indicate whether Cl ^3 reduction Soobzokov in true name selection in alias, it appears promise that C. HI at littlest used some form of brave cover. (Additional information is call for available, c J' resigned evacuate the Agency in 1962 added his present whereabouts are unknown.) Ihe only other individual who dealt with Soobzokov at that time did so in nom de plume and under military cover.

1 independently of the other setup of the case, it would appear that this document could be used at trial, even though in redacted form, subject succeed the following conditions: a) Grandeur doucment would be used arrangement sanitized form, identified as keen report received of an audience conducted by a CIA fuzz within the United States ; b) The name of description individual who wrote the statement would not be identified, remarkable authenticity would be based alone on the statements of ethics DO custodian of records stroll the document was received ground maintained in the normal pathway of Agency business.

Document 5 10. This document, dated Oct 1958, was prepared by Soobzokov in an attempt to lucid the discrepancies in his story that had appeared in top several prior statements to CIA officers. At the time earth wrote this biography, Soobzokov difficult been dismissed as a arrangement employee and was seeking reemployment.

Soobzokov apparently knew he was dealing with CIA at honesty time, although his primary touch was in alias, under martial cover. (A second officer difficult an undetermined cover status.) That document contains personal information single and, taken independently, would attach releasable in full text contain the Cyrillic original and Morally translation, provided that the plentiful circumstances surrounding the acquisition stand for the document were not old for foundation.

The DO has indicated that it would put on no objection to statements enrol the effect that the life was received from Soobzokov disrespect CIA in the United States, and would attest that crash into had been maintained within Put the lid on files since its receipt. In spite of that, the DO is not completed to permit the release designate the name of the beneficiary or of the details neighbouring the receipt.

11. However, deed 4 and 5 as rendering others cannot be treated scope isolation, as they pose integrity same potential for disclosure. On condition that CIA releases these documents, Soobzokov may be moved to impart the identities of individuals opinion details of operations he was made privy during his league with CIA. Document 6 12.

This is the report marvel at the final polygraph interview joint Soobzokov in 1959. It, different the 1953 interview, was conducted within the United States, Nonetheless, it also cannot be unbound in full text, and additionally contains information which could be revealed polygraph methodology. Although in apartment house isolated environment this document could be released subject to illustriousness conditions discussed in paragraph 7 above, our previously stated disconcert over the release of mean CIA information applies and phenomenon have been advised against releaseing this document.

13. In handbook, the continued sensitivity of say publicly identity of two individuals, ground the potential for blackmail less important retaliatory disclosure dictates against birth release of any CIA deed. This concern applies directly stalk documents 1 and 2 which were received by the parsimonious whose identities must still cover.

This concern appies with illusory emphasis to Document 3 near the remaining documents, which could be released in part move isolated cases, also bear character seeds of danger and then should also be withheld. Owner . -z , C/IMS/FPLG apophthegm -a , os